Andrey Chepelev vs Matthias Ujvary Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Ujvary has recently performed slightly better in second serve points, capturing 44.42%, compared to Chepelev's 41.92%. Could this performance hint at a competitive advantage for Ujvary?
• Analyzing return games, Ujvary outshines Chepelev in winning their opponent's second serve points with 52.25% versus 48%. However, Chepelev edges slightly ahead in first serve returns at 31.05% against Ujvary’s 30.26%. Which return could be more crucial?
• Under pressure, Ujvary has shown marginally better resilience, saving 52.5% of breakpoints, compared to Chepelev's 51.83%. This small edge could be pivotal during critical match moments.
• In head-to-head match record over the last year, Chepelev holds a slightly superior win rate of 58.14% over Ujvary's 55.93%. Does this suggest an edge for Chepelev?
• On clay surfaces, Chepelev appears more dominant with a 61% career win rate, whereas Ujvary has a 47% success rate. Will the match surface influence the outcome?
• Both players perform similarly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at $10K, with Ujvary having a slight edge with a win rate of 58.93% compared to Chepelev's 58.14%. How significant is this for predicting the match outcome?
• Regarding opponent quality, Ujvary has faced tougher competition, with the average opponent rank being 55 compared to Chepelev's 495.51. Could this experience factor play a crucial role?
• In deciding sets, Chepelev boasts a notable 57% win rate, whereas Ujvary has managed only 32%. Would a close match favor Chepelev?
• Ujvary has a slight advantage in breakpoint conversion, making 37.59% of opportunities count, compared to Chepelev's 34.08%. Will this prove decisive in critical match points?

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match shows a tightly contested battle between Ujvary and Chepelev. Ujvary's slightly better recent performance in second serve points and breakpoint conversion hints at a subtle edge in certain situations. However, Chepelev's ability to win deciding sets more frequently and consistent overall win rate reflects a seasoned player in potentially tight matches.

Despite Ujvary's exposure to higher-ranked opponents, Chepelev's superior win record on clay surfaces stands out significantly. As clay seems to benefit Chepelev historically, this surface advantage might give him the necessary leverage in this contest.

Considering these facts, Chepelev appears more likely to secure victory in this match, primarily due to his clay court proficiency and ability to handle high-pressure situations efficiently.